| |
|
Article 1: The History and Misconceptions
of Dominance Theory |
The original alpha/dominance model was
born out of short-term studies of wolf packs done in the 1940s.
These were the first studies of their kind. These studies were a
good start, but later research has essentially disproved most of the
findings. There were three major flaws in these studies:
- These were short-term studies, so the
researchers concentrated on the most obvious, overt parts of wolf
life, such as hunting. The studies are therefore unrepresentative
-- drawing conclusions about "wolf behavior" based on about 1% of
wolf life.
- The studies observed what are now
known to be ritualistic displays and misinterpreted them.
Unfortunately, this is where the bulk of the "dominance model"
comes from, and though the information has been soundly disproved,
it still thrives in the dog training mythos.
For example,
alpha rolls. The early researchers saw this behavior and concluded
that the higher-ranking wolf was forcibly rolling the subordinate
to exert his dominance. Well, not exactly. This is actually an
"appeasement ritual" instigated by the SUBORDINATE wolf. The
subordinate offers his muzzle, and when the higher-ranking wolf
"pins" it, the lower-ranking wolf voluntarily rolls and presents
his belly. There is NO force. It is all entirely
voluntary.
A wolf would flip another wolf against his will
ONLY if he were planning to kill it. Can you imagine what a forced
alpha roll does to the psyche of our dogs? .
- Finally, after the studies, the
researchers made cavalier extrapolations from wolf-dog, dog-dog,
and dog-human based on their "findings." Unfortunately, this
nonsense still abounds.
So what's the truth? The truth is dogs
aren't wolves. Honestly, when you take into account the number of
generations past, saying "I want to learn how to interact with my
dog so I'll learn from the wolves" makes about as much sense as
saying, "I want to improve my parenting -- let's see how the chimps
do it!"
Dr. Frank Beach performed a 30-year study
on dogs at Yale and UC Berkeley. Nineteen years of the study was
devoted to social behavior of a dog pack. (Not a wolf pack. A DOG
pack.) Some of his findings:
- Male dogs have a rigid
hierarchy.
- Female dogs have a hierarchy, but it's
more variable.
- When you mix the sexes, the rules get
mixed up. Males try to follow their constitution, but the females
have "amendments."
- Young puppies have what's called
"puppy license." Basically, that license to do most anything.
Bitches are more tolerant of puppy license than males are.
- The puppy license is revoked at
approximately four months of age. At that time, the older
middle-ranked dogs literally give the puppy hell --
psychologically torturing it until it offers all of the
appropriate appeasement behaviors and takes its place at the
bottom of the social hierarchy. The top-ranked dogs ignore the
whole thing.
- There is NO physical domination.
Everything is accomplished through psychological harassment. It's
all ritualistic.
- A small minority of "alpha" dogs
assumed their position by bullying and force. Those that did were
quickly deposed. No one likes a dictator.
- The vast majority of alpha dogs rule
benevolently. They are confident in their position. They do not
stoop to squabbling to prove their point. To do so would lower
their status because...
- Middle-ranked animals squabble. They
are insecure in their positions and want to advance over other
middle-ranked animals.
- Low-ranked animals do not squabble.
They know they would lose. They know their position, and they
accept it.
- "Alpha" does not mean physically
dominant. It means "in control of resources." Many, many alpha
dogs are too small or too physically frail to physically dominate.
But they have earned the right to control the valued resources. An
individual dog determines which resources he considers important.
Thus an alpha dog may give up a prime sleeping place because he
simply couldn't care less.
So what does this mean for the dog-human
relationship?
- Using physical force of any kind
reduces your "rank." Only middle-ranked animals insecure in their
place squabble.
- To be "alpha," control the resources.
I don't mean hokey stuff like not allowing dogs on beds or
preceding them through doorways. I mean making resources
contingent on behavior. Does the dog want to be fed. Great -- ask
him to sit first. Does the dog want to go outside? Sit first. Dog
want to greet people? Sit first. Want to play a game? Sit first.
Or whatever. If you are proactive enough to control the things
your dogs want, *you* are alpha by definition.
- Train your dog. This is the dog-human
equivalent of the "revoking of puppy license" phase in dog
development. Children, women, elderly people, handicapped people
-- all are capable of training a dog. Very few people are capable
of physical domination.
- Reward deferential behavior, rather
than pushy behavior. I have two dogs. If one pushes in front of
the other, the other gets the attention, the food, whatever the
first dog wanted. The first dog to sit gets treated. Pulling on
lead goes nowhere. Doors don't open until dogs are seated and I
say they may go out. Reward pushy, and you get pushy.
Your job is to be a leader, not a boss,
not a dictator. Leadership is a huge responsibility. Your job is to
provide for all of your dog's needs... food, water, vet care, social
needs, security, etc. If you fail to provide what your dog needs,
your dog will try to satisfy those needs on his own.
In a recent article in the Association of
Pet Dog Trainers (APDT) newsletter, Dr. Ray Coppinger -- a biology
professor at Hampshire College, co-founder of the Livestock Guarding
Dog Project, author of several books including Dogs : A Startling
New Understanding of Canine Origin, Behavior, and Evolution; and an
extremely well-respected member of the dog training community --
says in regards to the dominance model (and alpha
rolling)...
"I cannot think of many learning
situations where I want my learning dogs responding with fear and
lack of motion. I never want my animals to be thinking social
hierarchy. Once they do, they will be spending their time trying to
figure out how to move up in the hierarchy."
That pretty much sums it up, don't you
think?
Melissa Alexander melissa @
clickersolutions.com copyright 2001 Melissa C.
Alexander
Reprinted with author
permission.
|
|
|